<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>grits - the blenderbox blog &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.blenderbox.com/category/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.blenderbox.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:33:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Tip: 301 Redirect</title>
		<link>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2009/04/07/seo-tip-301-redirect/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2009/04/07/seo-tip-301-redirect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redirect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blenderbox.com/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This may be a refresh for the SEO experts out there, but this came up in conversation today at the office and I thought I&#8217;d share my new found knowledge! When a search engine indexes pages it considers http://blenderbox.com and http://www.blenderbox.com to be two different websites. While the idea of indexing twice sounds good, it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be a refresh for the SEO experts out there, but this came up in conversation today at the office and I thought I&#8217;d share my new found knowledge!</p>
<p>When a search engine indexes pages it considers http://blenderbox.com and http://www.blenderbox.com to be two different websites. While the idea of indexing twice sounds good, it is in fact bad for your Search Engine Optimization!</p>
<p>The popularity of your link is split between the two URLS, decreasing the value of each link and subsequently your site content.</p>
<p>The good news is there is a simple solution.</p>
<p>Create a 301 redirect on the site without the &#8216;www.&#8217; to make the site permanently redirect to your &#8216;www.&#8217; domain, combining your link popularity to represent the true value &#8211; and in the end improve your search result rankings!</p>
<p>If you found this tip helpful, please share the knowledge :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2009/04/07/seo-tip-301-redirect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash to get better indexing in search engines</title>
		<link>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2008/07/01/flash-to-get-better-indexing-in-search-engines/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2008/07/01/flash-to-get-better-indexing-in-search-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blenderbox.com/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe has finally publicly acknowledged their very important problem with SEO and Flash and has made an effort to make Flash content easier for search engines (specifically Yahoo! and Google) to index by collaborating with both Google and Yahoo!. From the press release: Adobe is providing optimized Adobe® Flash® Player technology to Google and Yahoo! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe has finally publicly acknowledged their very important problem with SEO and Flash and has made an effort to make Flash content easier for search engines (specifically Yahoo! and Google) to index by collaborating with both Google and Yahoo!.</p>
<p>From the press release:</p>
<blockquote><p>Adobe is providing optimized Adobe® Flash® Player technology to Google and Yahoo! to enhance search engine indexing of the Flash file format (SWF) and uncover information that is currently undiscoverable by search engines.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read more in the <a href="http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/200806/070108AdobeRichMediaSearch.html" target="_blank">press release</a></p>
<p>While I do see this as an great thing, I would still recommend developers use <a href="http://www.asual.com/swfaddress/" target="_blank">SWFAddress</a> to ensure deep linking to your content.  I can see how both search engines would be able to pick up the content properly, but it would surprise me if the indexing is able to tell a user where that content lives within the site.  It will be interesting to see how the content is indexed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2008/07/01/flash-to-get-better-indexing-in-search-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A brief overview of website optimization</title>
		<link>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2008/06/09/a-brief-overview-of-website-optimization/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2008/06/09/a-brief-overview-of-website-optimization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blenderbox.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Courtesy of the Google Analytics blog, an introduction to website optimization and how (and when) you should use it on your site. In summary, here&#8217;s how to optimize a poorly performing page on your website: Find your high value landing pages What pages on your site have high entrances and high bounce rates? These are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Courtesy of the Google Analytics blog, <a href="http://analytics.blogspot.com/2008/04/which-button-would-you-click-lesson-on.html">an introduction to website optimization and how (and when) you should use it on your site</a>.</p>
<p>In summary, here&#8217;s how to optimize a poorly performing page on your website:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Find your high value landing pages</strong><br />
What pages on your site have high entrances and high bounce rates? These are the &#8220;high value&#8221; pages that are begging to be optimized.</li>
<li><strong>What&#8217;s the desired goal (or conversion) for the site</strong>?<br />
In other words, what is the <em>ideal outcome</em> of a visit to your site? Some common online conversions include account signup, new lead generation, joining a mailing list, or purchasing a product.</li>
<li><strong>Set up a goal in Google Analytics</strong> to track how well your landing page is funneling people toward your desired conversion</li>
<li><strong>Create a new design for the landing page you want to test</strong></li>
<li><a href="http://websiteoptimizer.google.com/"><strong>Test it!</strong></a><br />
We were told at the LunaMetrics training session that you can expect actionable results within about a month, depending on the traffic to the page being tested. You could see statistically significant results in as little as two weeks in some circumstances.</li>
</ol>
<p>Talk to Caleb or me if you want to know more about website optimization or if you have questions about the jargon. We&#8217;ve been scouting a few pages on our sites in need of optimization and could always use more practice.</p>
<p>Finally, the Website Optimizer team has a <a href="http://websiteoptimizer.blogspot.com/">blog</a> that&#8217;s worth a look. I recommend starting with <a href="http://websiteoptimizer.blogspot.com/2008/05/online-marketing-in-uncertain-times.html">this case study</a>, in which conventional wisdom about the use of imagery on the homepage is tested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2008/06/09/a-brief-overview-of-website-optimization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>flash projects</title>
		<link>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2008/04/07/flash-projects/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2008/04/07/flash-projects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blenderbox.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While perusing the ever important osflash.org in preparation for some upcoming flash work, I came across some really great open source flash projects I thought might be interesting to some. movie masher Facilitates easy navigation of video, audio and image assets as well as effects, transitions and themes. Media can simply be dragged into the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While perusing the ever important <a href="http://osflash.org" target="_blank">osflash.org</a> in preparation for some upcoming flash work, I came across some really great open source flash projects I thought might be interesting to some.  </p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.moviemasher.com/" target="_blank">movie masher</a> <br/><br />
	<code>Facilitates easy navigation of video, audio and image assets as well as effects, transitions and themes. Media can simply be dragged into the timeline for inclusion in a mash.</code></li>
<li><a href="http://www.asual.com/swfaddress/" target="_blank">swf address</a> <br/><br />
	<code>A small, but powerful library that provides deep linking for Flash and Ajax</code></li>
<li><a href="http://osflash.org/ajaxanimator" target="_blank">ajax animator</a><br/><br />
	<code>Ajax Animator is a free open source web based flash ide designed for simplicity and community effort.</code></li>
</ul>
<p>The only issue I have with osflash is that a lot of the projects are out-dated and not removed or tagged as being so, and it can become difficult to figure out if it is still applicable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2008/04/07/flash-projects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s your SEO score?</title>
		<link>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2008/02/05/whats-your-seo-score/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2008/02/05/whats-your-seo-score/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blenderbox.com/2008/02/05/whats-your-seo-score/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[websitegrader.com I haven&#8217;t used it enough to be sure whether I trust the numbers, but it&#8217;s the first site I&#8217;ve seen that tries to distill SEO down to a single number. It&#8217;s worth checking out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.websitegrader.com/">websitegrader.com</a></p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t used it enough to be sure whether I trust the numbers, but it&#8217;s the first site I&#8217;ve seen that tries to distill SEO down to a single number. It&#8217;s worth checking out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2008/02/05/whats-your-seo-score/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Metrics for non-ecommerce websites</title>
		<link>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2007/12/10/metrics-for-non-ecommerce-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2007/12/10/metrics-for-non-ecommerce-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blenderbox.com/2007/12/10/metrics-for-non-ecommerce-websites/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[7 minute overview of how to get actionable metrics for non-ecommerce sites. In other words, how do you measure success when you don&#8217;t sell anything? Summary: Look at distributions, not averages. Averages lie. Three pieces of data are particularly valuable on non-ecommerce websites: time spent on site, visitor recency (when was the last time a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LgXDUuAK77M&#038;rel=1&#038;border=0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LgXDUuAK77M&#038;rel=1&#038;border=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p>7 minute overview of how to get actionable metrics for non-ecommerce sites. In other words, how do you measure success when you don&#8217;t sell anything?</p>
<p>Summary:</p>
<ul>
<li>Look at distributions, not averages. Averages lie.</li>
<li>Three pieces of data are particularly valuable on non-ecommerce websites: <strong>time spent on site</strong>, <strong>visitor recency</strong> (when was the last time a visitor visited the site), and <strong>depth of visit</strong> (how many pages did the visitor consume?)</li>
<li>Focus on the distributions of data for all three of these metrics. Averages lie.</li>
</ul>
<p>There are plenty more short Google Analytics videos like this one at the appropriately titled <a href="http://www.analyticssupport.com/blog/2007/10/ultimate-google-analytics-video-roundup.html">Ultimate Google Analytics Video Roundup</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.blenderbox.com/2007/12/10/metrics-for-non-ecommerce-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
